Our Stores | Open 9am - 10pm every day

TUCSON LOCATIONS

OTHER LOCATIONS

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Bookmans News

My fellow Tucsonans,

I am writing you once more about the upcoming vote for the pawn/secondhand tax. I know that today in study session the Chief of Police will give you his recommendation that you enact this ordinance. As clearly as possible I want to say this is bad law based on flawed logic. The justification for this new tax, on a certain segment of our community, is that we cause more work for our public servants and therefore should pay some of those costs. If this rational were carried to its logical conclusion then any of us that cause "extra work" would have to pay for that burden. Should neighborhoods that have more crime and require more visits from our police pay higher taxes? How about areas of town with old houses paying more because the fire department has more calls to that area? This is not the way things are done in our society. Or perhaps those who already pay more taxes do deserve a faster response time? This is not the way it is supposed to work. We all expect and deserve an equal amount of service regardless of our contribution to the governments coffers. I am asking you to really consider the message you are sending with this law if it passes. Tying any governmental service to how much you pay is bad law and bad precedence.

Please consider a minor flat increase in the business license tax across the board to help our police department provide the services that all businesses need regardless of our particular chosen professions.

Thank you,
Bob Oldfather
CEO and Founder, Bookmans

Comments
by: Anonymous (not verified)
May 11, 2010

Actually, that is precisely how taxes should work.

The better argument to take here is that the tax will effectively serve as added insurance against property theft for the ENTIRE population, but the cost of that insurance will be paid regressively only by those who shop second hand. If the general population wishes additional protection, the general population should pay for it. They should not ask me, a frequent purchaser of second hand books and a law-abiding citizen, to pay for that protection for them.

by: Bonnie (not verified)
May 11, 2010

The pawn/secondhand tax once again targets a small segment of our business community to balance the budget. When will legislatures take that big step back to gain an overview?

by: Anonymous (not verified)
May 11, 2010

Well stated.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options